Kong
December 28, 2005 | 27 Dhul-Qadah 1426
Kong. Should you see it? Yeah, you should. Was it good? Yeah, it was. Do I have a lot of issues with the story? Well…, yeah, I do. But you knew that already! So prepare yourself, as I analyze - KONG!!
You’ll probably wanna know some stuff about the current telling of the tale - maybe some techie stuff. First, Peter Jackson and crew are absolutely amazing. If you thought the stuff he did in LoTR was good - Kong, in my opinion’s, better. Not better from a story telling perspective but from what they can do with their computers. Andy Sirkis, the guy who played Gollum in LoTR did the body and facial movements for Kong. I guess that’s why he looks so damned good.
I found Kong to be an interesting commentary on race and forbidden love. It was interesting how at that time especially, Westerners had a fascination with the Orient and with Africa. Skull Island, the place where Kong was living, was inhabited by a bunch of dark-skinned, aboriginal people. They were savage and brutish. The partook on some kind of cannibalistic religion. They offered up sacrifices to Kong. In many ways, Skull Island was this place where white people just didn’t belong - they’re out of their element. Read more this entry »

While seeing the latest offering in the Harry Potter enterprise I saw the new trailer for Superman Returns. I am very excited - Superman is one of my favorite super heroes. While surfing around on the net I came across a forum where people were discussing how much could Superman lift and if he could break adamantium. Could Superman kick Wolverine’s butt? God!, that’s about as entertaining as Alien vs. Predator. Such are the questions of geeks who’ve read too many comics and played to many role-playing games and have missed the whole point of the character. Superman is not about stats - how much he can lift, how fast he can fly, how much adamantium he can bend or break. Superman’s about ethics, morals and principles. He’s about purpose. Superman is akin to an angle, or if I could extend myself here, a Prophet. He can perform super-human actions with ease. He has a moral compass that’s set to a higher standard than ours. Never does Superman have to weight the scales for what is right or wrong - angst is for Bruce Wayne and Batman, not for the son of Jor-El.
If you haven’t seen the movie yet and don’t wanna read what goes down, skip to the next post. I went to see Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire with my brother Mike, Scott, Darcy and Jamar. I just recently bought the first book and am reading it now. I was impressed at how readable it is. I thought it would be too kiddy. So I was really looking forward to seeing this one. It wasn’t that it was bad - I just don’t think it was as good as the last one. It felt like it was a T.V. episode verses a movie. It also didn’t seem to climax enough for me. Maybe there were too many sub-plot developments. Hermoine and her new boy friend, who I thought was going to have a bigger role to play and the new kid in the movie who didn’t make it all the way through. Ron getting jealous of Harry. And of course, Ray Finnes as Voldemort. So, while I did like it, I felt that it fell a little short of what I was looking. Question was, what was I looking for?